Smt. Savita Rajaram Majagaonkar
##article.abstract##
Student engagement in Physical Education (PE) is a critical determinant of both short-term participation and long-term physical activity habits. Student engagement in PE is multidimensional, comprising behavioral, emotional, and cognitive components that contribute to learning outcomes and health benefits. A wide body of research highlights a range of influences on student engagement, including instructional practices, teacher support, psychological needs, social context, and curriculum design. This paper focuses on key factors that influence students’ engagement in PE classes.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
• Chen, S., Sun, H., Zhu, X., & Ennis, C. D. (2017). Content knowledge, learning task representation, and pedagogical content knowledge in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0189
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(3), 365–396.
• Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 222–239.
• Guo, N., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2025). The influence of teacher support on student engagement in physical education among college students: The mediating effects of autonomous motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education Research.
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Barkoukis, V., Wang, J. C. K., Baranowski, J., & Roberts, G. C. (2009). Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 376–392.
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more or less engaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 1–17.
• Kamaludin, Y. A., Marwan, I., & Juniar, D. T. (2025). Factors influencing middle school students’ learning motivation in physical education: Literature review. Journal of Moderasi Olahraga, 6(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.53863/mor.v6i1.1948
• Moreno, M. P., et al. (2025). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6039.
• Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242.
• Ommundsen, Y., & Kvalø, K. (2007). How autonomy support influences engagement in physical education: A longitudinal study. Behavioral Sciences Journal.
• Rink, J. E. (2010). Teaching physical education for learning (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & van der Mars, H. (2020). Complete guide to sport education (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
• Silverman, S., & Mercier, K. (2015). Teaching for physical literacy: Implications to instructional design and pedagogy. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 150–155.
• Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411–433.
• Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). Self-Determination Theory in physical education settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 181–203). University of Rochester Press (as cited in Vasconcellos et al., 2019).
• Ulstad, S., Halvari, H., & Sørebø, Ø. (2016). Motivation, learning strategies, and performance in physical education at secondary school. Advances in Physical Education, 6, 27–41.
