EMPATHY AND HOMONEGATIVITY AMONG GEN Z INDIVIDUALS
Keywords:
Gen-Z, Empathy, HomonegativityAbstract
The present study aimed to understand the relationship between empathy and homonegativity among Gen Z individuals. The study was conducted among 348 participants aged 18–30, who were selected using a convenience sampling method. The tools used in the study were the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire and the Modern Homonegativity Scale. The results revealed significant negative correlations between empathy and homonegativity. Empathy emerged as a strong negative predictor of homonegativity. Gender differences were observed, with women reporting higher empathy and lower homonegativity than men. Additionally, participants from urban areas scored higher on empathy, whereas those from rural regions exhibited higher levels of homonegativity. The study’s findings have significant implications for educational institutions, policymakers, mental health professionals, and diversity advocates seeking to promote inclusive attitudes among young people, particularly those in Gen Z.
Downloads
References
Abramson, A. (2021, November 1). Cultivating empathy. Monitor on Psychology, 52(8). American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality. Archibald, J. G., & Dunn, T. (2014). Sexual attitudes as predictors of homonegativity in college women. Georgia Journal of College Student Affairs, 30(1). Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248–254. Dahl, J., Vescio, T., & Weaver, K. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254., M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. Devdiscourse News Desk. (2024, September 8). Gen Z revolution: Transforming India's consumer market. Devdiscourse. Dyvik, E. H. (2024, October 15). LGBTQ+ worldwide: Statistics & facts. Statista. Encyclopædia Britannica. (n.d.). Sexual orientation. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 40–66. Hoominfar, E. (2019). Gender socialization. In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 1–10). Springer. John, A. N., Stoebenau, K., Ritter, S., Edmeades, J., & Balvin, N. (2017). Gender socialization during adolescence in low- and middle-income countries: Conceptualization, influences and outcomes. UNICEF Office of Research–Innocenti. Kaufman, M. R., Eschliman, E. L., & Karver, T. S. (2023). Differentiating sex and gender in health research to achieve gender equity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 101(10), 666–671. Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. Leiberg, S., & Anders, S. (2006). The multiple facets of empathy: A survey of theory and evidence. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 419–440. Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870. Mendoza-Pérez, J. C., & Ortiz-Hernández, L. (2021). Association between overt and subtle experiences of discrimination and violence and mental health in homosexual and bisexual men in Mexico. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, NP12686–NP12707. Meyza, K. Z., Bartal, I. B., Monfils, M. H., Panksepp, J. B., & Knapska, E. (2017). The roots of empathy: Through the lens of rodent models. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 76(Part B), 216–224. Online, E. (2024, October 21). Gen Z: Brands chase 37.7 crore Indians for the $1.4 trillion money they may spend—The Economic Times. Perry, B. L., & Willits, F. K. (2011). Understanding the rural–urban divide in gay and lesbian attitudes. Rural Sociology, 76(1), 51–79. Pickett, B. (2021). Homosexuality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.). Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2016). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis. Smith, K. E., et al. (2010). [Article details incomplete in original]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5). Titchener, E. B. (2014). Introspection and empathy. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 7(1), 47–59. Topal, C. A., Ucgun, T., & Gurel, R. (2024). Empathy and LGBTI perspectives among university nursing students in Türkiye. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 53, 71–77. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books. Verma, D., Bhardwaj, R., & Sachan, R. (2019). The characteristic behavioural traits of Generation Z: A study in rural demography setup of India, Sonbhadra, U.P. Journal of Management, 6(1).
